Talk:Philip Owen

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

NPOV

Ugh, where to start. If I can find actual evidence to contradict these points I will go ahead and change the article myself, but for now I just want to address them.

1.

His political longevity was not matched by widespread popularity

I don't believe this is true, but even if it is, where's the evidence?

2.

His Non-Partisan Association party often publicly split 
with him on policy disputes

I recall this happening in the last one or two years of his mayorship, but not before.

3.

and led to some embarrassing compromises.

Which were?

As well, despite winning three elections (1993, 1996, 1999) 
he never enjoyed widespread public support

See 1.

4.

Much of his electoral success was attributed to a lack of capable
opponents, as well as a general declining interest in municipal
politics among Vancouver voters.

See 1.

I agree with your points, anonymous user. In its present form, it is a slap-dash article that does not address any of the issues of the Owen years (the Olympic bid, the Woodwards redevelopment, the dispute over "harm reduction," etc.), but rather reflects the original author's personal reaction to the character of the man. If you could fix it up, you'd be doing us all a service, and I will be happy to help if you take the lead. Fishhead64, 06:10, 30 January 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Oh oops, didn't realise I didn't sign my post above, sorry about that. I am *really* not much of a researcher, but if I can find any reliable sources on the net I'd be happy to try to put some sourced material into the article. Any help would be most appreciated.--Anchoress 07:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Drug reform

Mentioning that he championed drug reform is misleading without mentioning that he initially opposed it vehemently, wanting to lock all the addicts up in a military base and hoping that, soon enough, they'd all be dead of AIDS. Philologick (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Philip Owen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907070442/http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/fourpillars/ to http://www.city.vancouver.bc.ca/fourpillars/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Flag of Vancouver, Canada.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]