Talk:Philip H. Dybvig

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events.
Notice date: 10 October 2022. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate.

Full name

His full name can be found in his PhD dissertation: Philip Hallen Dybvig. Source: In https://scholar.google.de/citations?user=TwFupW0AAAAJ, the only paper from 1979. Where can we add this info to the article? --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 15:50, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was edited/added 20:17, 10 Oct 2022. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 19:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Allegations

The subject of this articles has been accused of several crimes by former students of his on Chinese messageboards. This being reported on by several journalists on twitter. The article subject is considered a Public Figure - so it seems worth mentioning this in the actual article. And the sources being journalists should mean it passes the bar for sourcing. Let me know if this does not pass the bar for inclusion in the article. Thank you. DrDrWhale (talk) 19:19, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source, a WeChat article's comment, I can also post. Kcx36 (talk) 20:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also have a WeChat. But the sources I posted were journalists, and the posts themselves are attached to real names. These are very credible sources in my view. Here is another journalist at Bloomberg collecting additional testimonies: https://twitter.com/fxy2014/status/1580942927957610496?s=20&t=XTro8fCP7eDDpewGqkbW2w

Let me know what you think. DrDrWhale (talk) 23:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the first sentence on this page: This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]