Talk:Philadelphia Experiment

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Philadelphia Experiment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 2 months

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal Mid‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Counter Illuminance

I believe that the whole Philadelphia Project story is confabulated from real war time research that would have made ships sitting on the horizon relative to another ship very difficult to see. Please see the Wikipedia article http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Diffused_lighting_camouflage. This research was abandoned because high resolution radar was developed within a short period of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.19.179 (talk) 22:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds a lot like original research, but if you can find a reliable source to support your claim you're more than welcome to add it. SadBlueRobot (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is an educational TV documentary on this. It confirms with photos, films, and interviews with people involved that it was a, now declassified, secret counter luminescence experiment that went wrong. The counter luminence lights overloaded the ship's electrical system and caused a fire producing acrid, toxic smoke from burning insulation and metal. There were no deaths but several smoke inhalation casualties. The ship returned to port and experiments scheduled with that equipment were canceled at that time.

98.164.67.198 (talk) 07:14, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I find this interesting because when I saw this movie and had really enjoyed it, I was telling my father - who had worked in Canadian Naval R&D at Ste Hyacinthe during WWII - all about the plot, and his comment was "Yeah. That's basically what happened". This man was not a fantasist or a conspiracy theorist, so leaves me to wonder even more. CybercroneCA (talk) 02:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your father sounds like a man with a dry humor or like someone who likes tall tales, but Wikipedia articles are based on reliable sources, not on hearsay from random people on the internet. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible fictional inspration

I've found a short story from 1942 that might be the origin or at least the inspiration for this story. 'The Phantom Armada' written by Stanton A. Coblentz (Possibly a pseudonym), published in Fantastic Adventures features the US Navy deploying an experimental 'invisibility smokescreen' in 1982 whose effects turn out to be a little longer lasting than the inventor intended. 58.175.90.122 (talk) 00:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with ref citations.

In the first paragraph of the Origins there's a list of numbers that are presumably references but they have no hypertext. 62.49.216.195 (talk) 13:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean "27–29, 35, 65, 80, 102, 115, 163–165" - those are page numbers. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:55, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]