Talk:Phil Pressey/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Disc Wheel (talk · contribs) 15:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Everything checks out, the prose, lead, and sources. My only concern is the lack of photo(s). Are there not any available in the commons? I feel like you could put a picture of his father in near the personal section, provided there is one. The article just needs a single photo in my opinion. Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 15:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

There are no images on commons. I have made some relicensing queries on flickr. However, WP:WIAGA does not require any images. Thus, if images are your only concern, this article should pass.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Never knew that... well good work then. Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 16:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)