Talk:Phil Fish/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tezero (talk · contribs) 22:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I'll field this one, as I happen to have read through the article before. I'm not sure whether it's there yet, but it's definitely close. Oh, and I realize we've had some recent disagreements on the notability of articles I'm involved with, and will probably continue to have more, but I don't want that to interfere with this review. With that out of the way, I'll be back in a couple hours. Tezero (talk) 22:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some copyedit-type fixes, nothing major.
Not an issue for GA, but "for which it received some notoriety" could be elaborated on.
The mention of The Golden Compass in "Works" doesn't need a citation.
I'd remark after the initial mentions of Power Pill and Super Hypercube that the games would never be released. If I didn't know Fish had quit the industry (though honestly I wouldn't be surprised if he came back in a year or two), I'd initially expect that the games had been released, and would not realize the contrary until paragraphs later.
I seem to recall that the Fez cover art is free-use. That'd be nice to include somewhere on Fish's page.

That settles it! Quality work as usual. I'll stop by if you ever elect to take this one to FAC. Tezero (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]