Talk:Philémon (comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by European comics work group.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

I think the current title isn't very helpful, and it goes against current naming conventions (Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline). Primarily, this article must be about Philémon, the series of books. Had this subject been massive and need to spread out onto other articles, the current title might come handy, but this isn't the case. Anyone think of a reason not to move to Philémon (comics) ? MURGH ^disc. 01:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Murgh! I started this article and I have no objections. It's not a controversial move so I guess you can change the name without a debate. No? Frédérick Lacasse 17:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frédérick. I thought this would be uncontroversial, but from looking at the history, you created it under Philémon, and it got renamed later, so one can never know. Courtesy says (I think I read somewhere) that the announcement should stay up "a few days" for eventual objections to be voiced. So unless a heated debate springs up, I'll do it pretty soon. MURGH ^disc. 19:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hem! Sorry, you right! I tought this article's current name was mine but, obviously, it is not the case, I just forgot. We should keep the tag few days if someone has an objection. Thanks for the initiative. Frédérick Lacasse 20:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since there were no objections we can safely say it was uncontroversial. Proceeding with move. MURGH ^disc. 02:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fred-philemon04.jpg

Image:Fred-philemon04.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The FUR has since been adjusted to the demands of WP:NFCC#10c. MURGH ^disc. 21:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]