Talk:Phenyltropane
 | This article was nominated for deletion on May 23, 2007. The result of the discussion was STUBIFY. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]This was formerly a much longer article. This longer version may be found in the history.
There is a lot of information here, and I think it needs some cleanup in terms of layout and formatting (example: many bullet points) BierHerr 13:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
This article has a lot of useful material and is well researched, but it could do with some rewriting in places to make the language more appropriate for a wikipedia article, not to mention easier to understand for the average person...as someone with a postgraduate degree in medicinal chemistry it all makes sense to me and indeed if this article had been written 2 years ago when I was doing research in this area it would have been a useful resource, but much of the content is very complex and could do with some more explanation in "layman's" language. However given the frequent edits by the primary author I think it is still very much a work in progress and other editors can come back and add or re-write sections as required once Nuklear is satisfied with the content. Meodipt 04:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Ok Nuklear I have added an introduction for the general public...I know we understand all this technical stuff but theres no need to scare everyone else off by launching straight into it with no intro!
Meodipt 12:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Before stubification.
[edit]I believe it was a great, informative article before it was "stubified". It's last large permutation being here. However it didn't fit in with Wikipedia's manual of style. It's only problem in my opinion is that it used too many nonstandard charts and graphs that could have been incorporated differently, in a less flashy way, and continue to give all the same information. It would be a loss to Wikipedia if someone did not properly add all of what was given in such a way. Nagelfar (talk) 16:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Please Keep
[edit]Strong disagree with decision to stub this article. This may be important in overall understanding of treating addiction and is not material deleterious Nuvigil (talk) 01:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)