Talk:Pfizer/Archives/2020
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Controversy Regarding Involvement in Embryonic Stem-cell Enterprises
I could be blind as well as almost deaf, but I did not see any reference to Pfizer's involvement in Embryonic Stem-Cells -- its promotion of such and pursuit of companies involved in such. If it is referenced in the article and I just did not find it, I apologize. Otherwise, I think it would be beneficial and accurate to include such information. Tesseract501 (talk) 00:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
New Accuracy Report on COVID-19 Vaccine
As of November 18, 2020 the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine has been reported to have a 95% accuracy rate
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/pfizer-vaccine-95-effective-final-analysis-plans-seek/story?id=74267353&cid=clicksource_4380645_1_heads_hero_live_hero_hed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emd1047 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Should read first *Western* Country to approve. Djp~enwiki (talk) 23:49, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2020
![]() | This edit request to Pfizer has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change traveled to travelled, sentence is just under 1996 Nigeria outbreak 2A02:C7F:5852:CF00:16D:8C6B:3FB3:B7AC (talk) 12:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- It's correct in American English (WP:ENGVAR) – Thjarkur (talk) 12:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Edit request
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add a hatnote to the disambiguation page
{{otheruses}}