Jump to content

Talk:Petrus Lengkong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by BorgQueen (talk06:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that Petrus Lengkong practiced his wood carving skill in military barracks?
    • ALT1: ... that Petrus Lengkong, an Indonesian artist known for Dayak arts, was born from Minahasan parents?
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: DYK Later, as usual, new article and CE will be appreciated

Created by Nyanardsan (talk). Self-nominated at 21:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Petrus Lengkong, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - ALT0 is not supported by the source. The Jakarta Post only describes paintings and drawings as the subject's artistic works during his time in the military. Wood carving is not mentioned in the source until after his retirement from military service. ALT1 is also not supported by the source. The Tribun Pontianak article does write that his parents are from North Sulawesi, but it does not specifically mention Minahasan descent.
  • Interesting: No - No verified hook has been presented.

QPQ: No - Not done
Overall: There are some significant issues in this article, such as instances of misrepresentation of sources and overreliance on a source whose reliability is suspect. It may still be salvageable, but considerable work is needed. —Arsonal (talk + contribs)23:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • After giving some thoughts, please fail the nomination and I think I will AfD this. I struggled to find more detailed source than Bergelora, which could be disputed its reliability according to what you mentioned. Nyanardsan (talk) 01:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]