Jump to content

Talk:Petrillo Music Shell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePetrillo Music Shell has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 9, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 22, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Petrillo Music Shell was commissioned by Mayor of Chicago Anton Cermak to help lift the spirits of the citizenry with free concerts following the Great Depression?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Petrillo Music Shell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mikemoral (talk · contribs)

  • Construction on the wood and fiber E. V. Buchsbaum design began on a budget of $12,500 ($178,618 in current dollar terms), and the opening of free concerts commenced on August 24, 1931.
    Just as a general note, the MOS says to include the type of dollars, but I'm assuming that it would be US dollars. The phrase "current dollar terms" could probably be better worded as "in today's dollars" or something similar.
  • In 1953 a referendum was almost held on the November 3 Election Day ballot for a $3 million ($24.4 million in current dollar terms) structure, but at the last minute a bond issue was denied.
    Again, the phrase "current dollar terms" is still somewhat awkward, in my opinion.
    I must apologize, but real life has caught up with my Internet time. Unfortunately, I will be unable to complete the GA review until I’m done with RL stuff. —Mikemoral♪♫ 02:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Looks good, I'd suggest the lead be trimmed a bit, but I'm not going to fail the GA over that.

Mikemoral♪♫ 00:37, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Petrillo Music Shell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]