Talk:Peter Winn (footballer)

Peter Winn (footballer) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 16, 2019. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peter Winn (footballer) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Peter Winn (footballer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peter Winn (footballer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 10:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pick this one up, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

Infobox

Source for his full name?

Lead

Very short paragraphs are usually frowned upon. The opening is only a single sentence on its own. Could do with merging this with the paragraph below.
If you merge, drop Winn for He at the start of the following sentence.
Perhaps link loaned out to Loan (sports) for the uninitiated.

Stevenage

FA Cup is linked in the first paragraph but also in the previous paragraph. No need for the repeat link in such close proximity.
"Winn scored Stevenage's third goal of the game in injury-time to seal the victory. Winn described the goal as the "biggest moment of his career", these two sentences could potentially merged. "Seal the victory, describing the goal as..." perhaps?
"after his foot had caught Southend defender Sean Clohessy in the face", the source for this only states it was for a challenge?

Macclesfield Town

"He kept a clean sheet during the match" > remainder of the match? As he only played just over 20 minutes in goal it's probably worth distinguishing that.

Chester

"Having played twelve times for Chester during the first half of the season due to injury", only twelve times perhaps? Right now there's nothing to indicate that this is considered lower than the norm.
"twelve appearances at King's Lynn's" > King's Lynn?
"ultimately secured King's Lynn survival", vice versa here.

References

There are a couple of error messages being returned in refs 59 and 60. Seemingly because you're adding your own italic markup rather than using the newspaper= parameter.

Good quality article as usual, a few minor points to be addressed above. Placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 12:07, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: Thanks for reviewing the article, Kosack. All valid points again. I have gone through and made all of the above changes. Let me know if there is anything else. Cheers. SBFCEdit (talk) 02:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We still have the issue of a single sentence opening paragraph? Kosack (talk) 09:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just changed it now. Thought you were referring to the paragraph below that. SBFCEdit (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see, no worries. I'm happy that this meets the GA criteria and the minor issues above have been resolved. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 20:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]