This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Production; a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's documentation of Record Production articles. Questions or comments related to record production and related articles are welcome at the project's talk page. Anyone interested may join the project: add your name to the list of project members!Record ProductionWikipedia:WikiProject Record ProductionTemplate:WikiProject Record ProductionRecord Production
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
I tagged this as an article written like an ad, with a lot of peacock words and opinionated claims like "legendary bluesman" (not for him, for someone else, but nevertheless). I moved some stuff around, took out most of the egregious problems, including overformatting, and left it in an intelligible state. But it still needs sourcing and the reviews at the bottom should be incorporated either into articles on the albums or the body of the article as sources, not as an indiscriminate list that violates WP:EL. It does seem that Malick is notable, but the article's promotional tone buried that and I almost nominated it for deletion. By moving the key claims of notability into the lead it clarifies what is important about his career. --Dhartung | Talk07:48, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
