Talk:Peter Linehan

Peter Linehan was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 10, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 31 August 2021 by reviewer JBW (talk · contribs).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Moved to draft

Substantial obituaries in The Times, the Telegraph and El Pais are sufficient to pass GNG. Article should be a stub, not a draft.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cagliost (talk • contribs)

Agreed. @Htanaungg:, can you please explain why this needed to be moved to draft seven minutes after creation by User:Cagliost? And what in the stub requires better sourcing? 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:69AA:AD25:80F8:B9C5 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you really think this article is notable enough and having good reliable references, you may submit the same draft for review. Htanaungg (talk) 12:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of course they can. They already had when you posted that reply. Now please answer my question: what in the stub required better sourcing? 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:69AA:AD25:80F8:B9C5 (talk) 14:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Amigo

Linehan once used a fake Facebook account to monitor students. Probably not worth mentioning. [1] [2] cagliost (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peter Linehan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: asilvering (talk · contribs) 20:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this, but this is a quick fail, as it is a long way from meeting the GA criteria. The most important one in this case is number 3: "It addresses the main aspects of the topic". This article is very brief, and does not discuss Linehan's scholarship except to name books and positions held. Someone who doesn't already know who Linehan was and what his research accomplished won't learn much from this page - just that he was a historian of Spain at Cambridge. What was his scholarship? How did it evolve over time? Who has he inspired in turn? A Good Article doesn't need detailed coverage of each of his books, but should give significantly more information about his research than this.

Here are two historian GAs, for comparison: William H. Prescott, Marc Bloch. A Good Article doesn't need to be nearly this long, and these may not fully meet current GA criteria as they were both passed some time ago, but I link them here to give an idea of the kinds of information that this article could contain, and does not.

Good luck with this article, and feel free to ask if you have any questions.

-- asilvering (talk) 21:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]