This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Florin Curta, the author, must have worked with Heather on at least one book where Curta was editor and Heather wrong the Afterword. I like this line: "Peter Heather, however, is skeptical about skepticism." --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 13:39, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand how this line "Heather's works have been generally accepted in academia as the definite narrative on the fall of Rome." is supportive by this quotation from the source "Heather’s book was quickly championed, by British academics in particular, as a new, definitive narrative of the Fall of Rome...", unless British academics are the main people in academia who study the fall of Rome, which I find surprising. Nil Einne (talk) 13:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Did away with this nonsense, apparently, it's been here for a while, which I find rather frustrating to be honest. Okay, someone had inserted "British", but there can certainly be no talk of "general acceptance", in Britain or elsewhere, when the following section is literally on "Criticism" (and rather strong contemporary criticism at that). I wish people would learn to read before editing wikipedia, or else stop wilfully misquoting (I suspect it's the latter to be honest) Mike F (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, you're probably right. I edited it to at least say what is in the quotation in order to not start any edit wars, or not be accused of deleting sourced "information", but yeah, I doubt that academics in a highly contested field would use the term "definitive narrative" too often to begin with Mike F (talk) 17:01, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
