Talk:Peter C. Gøtzsche
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Peter C. Gøtzsche. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070621235925/http://www.danmedbul.dk/Dmb_2006/0406/0406-artikler/DMB3890.htm to http://www.danmedbul.dk/Dmb_2006/0406/0406-artikler/DMB3890.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
links
[edit]http://www.madinamerica.com/author/pgotzsche/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Ten (talk • contribs) 03:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
A new section on psychotropics
[edit]Dear all,
Should I add a new huge section with Gotzsche's critic of psychotropics? His input in this speciality is colossal. We can put in this section three mains things
- exaggerating benefits and hiding up deaths in clinical trials
- increased risk of death on psychotropics
- doubtful effectiveness
Any ideas?
--Mladovesti (talk) 21:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Dead Reference
[edit]Citation [2] does not link anywhere and so is not verifiable. Should I replace with [citation needed], or delete all quotes with that citation attached? I.e. in section entitled “Expulsion from Cochrane…”
The quote is supposedly from the Cochrane institute itself and is therefore biased and clearly aimed at damaging the man’s reputation. If the Cochrane Institute does not want people to know the specific reason for the expulsion then it should not be on Wikipedia surely?