Talk:Peter Abell

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Page created! Engelo (talk) 13:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag explanation

For purposes of transparency: While it appears the small amount of quasi-promotional material was removed from the article some time ago, it's still typically the norm to tag the article when the creator of said article, or a major contributor, have a close association with the subject. This isn't a "badge of shame" or anything of the sort, as COI editors (with the exception of the subject themselves) may still technically edit any article they choose, so long as they disclose that they have a conflict of interest. It serves the purpose of allowing Wikipedia to be above-board, and as transparent as possible, as well as allowing editors to know that they should be vigilant in making the article as neutral as possible.

All that being said, it appears to me that, aside from some claims in the article needing to be sourced per WP:BLP, this article conforms otherwise to policy, and is not overly promotional or written from any particular point of view. Good work. :) Quinto Simmaco (talk) 05:57, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Agree with Quinto; I know Abell professionally, at a distance, and the article is surprisingly down beat. I will remove the COI tag in 2020 if there are no comments. I also think he may have been given a knighthood - I believe for his work in setting up the LSE - Can anyone confirm that?

Petr Ivanovitch (who can't log in for some reason) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.255.235.203 (talk) 10:00, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm he has not been given a knighthood. --Engelo (talk) 23:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]