Talk:Persona 2: Innocent Sin/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Will be happy to offer a review. JAGUAR 22:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- "The original version was not localized for western territories, but the PSP version was released" - however
- "Persona 2: Innocent Sin is a role-playing game where the player takes control of a group of High School students" - should high school be capitalised here?
- Personally I would rephrase "Innocent Sin began development after the release and success of Persona" to Development of Innocent Sin began after the release and success of Persona
- "The original audio was lauded by Bartholow, saying the voice acting" - stating
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutral
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable, no edit warring
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No images used
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
This article meets the GA criteria and I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, so I'll pass it now. Well done! JAGUAR 11:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Whoa, that was fast! Thank you for the review! (although I was not the one who wrote the article - that honor goes to ProtoDrake).--IDVtalk 11:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)