Talk:Permanent normal trade relations/Archives/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Permanent normal trade relations. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
China section
Somebody please rewrite that section. Reading it made me cringe, and I can't proof an article on my phone.173.209.212.239 (talk) 05:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
I agree, the section is not really from a neutral point of view and contains quite some unbacked statements. For example, the following sentence "Congress as whole thought that without these things America would fall behind economically and technologically to some enemies of America." is just so unbelievable. Is it really true? We all know how politics works. Usually Congress never thinks anything, it's just a bunch of particular interests. And is this an important information, even if it is true. As it is this reads more like a novel. 134.76.223.2 (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2015 (UTC)