This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Turkish hockey player Perihan Çınar was many times named most valuable player and top goalscorer at domestic and international competitions? Source: "En iyi oyuncu" (in Turkish)[1], [2], [3], "Gol kraliçesi" (in Turkish)[4], [5], [6]
(Not a review) The hook is pretty boring, even if it were to be formatted to make it more idiomatic. Reading the article, I don't see anything more interesting. Please watch for typos; I corrected two just giving the page a quick glance. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know who is obstructive. What do you mean whit a link to Turkish hockey. That was the link as I understood your request. For the license obtaining I advise you maybe ask someone you know who is familiar with sports. CeeGee06:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The link you have provided shows that her getting a license is not intriguing in the slightest—it might as well say "her parents filled out some forms when she was eleven". Since no interesting hooks have been nominated in the last week, I am marking this as rejected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess you misunderstand the fact. At age eleven, she is able to fill out any forms. How do you know that her parents have filled out the forms. Besides, what does make the obtaining of the license not important. Do you try to fabricate reasons to block the nomination? I am sure someone would pay attention to your action. CeeGee09:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because I read the link you provided but clearly did not read yourself, which states that any license application from a person under eighteen needs parental permission. You are welcome to ask for wider attention at WT:DYK; I would however suggest you don't accuse others of acting in bad faith. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't clear that minors need parental consent to enter into legal contracts. The fact is, however, she obtained the license to perform hockey in a clubata t her age eleven. The problem is that you come with unlogical arguments. CeeGee06:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CeeGee: I think the interestingness issue AirshipJungleman29 is alluding to is that obtaining a license to play a fairly dangerous sport professionally at a young age implies a level of skill, respect, or otherwise being a prodigy, while the reality is that anyone's parents can apply for such a license. At least, that's the only issue I can see with what they're complaining about. The question is - while the truth may be bland, it would not be technically incorrect to simply say the license was obtained at that age - so would it be wrong of DYK to let readers assume the fact is more interesting than it is? Kingsif (talk) 02:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingsif: Thank you very much indeed for your detailed axplanations. With "obtained her license at age 12", it is meant that she seriously started performing hockey sport at that very young age. I think this is interesting because not every kid starts performing hockey so early. If the readers would think this is not interesting at all, I can accept. But how do I learn that readers' opinion? CeeGee07:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CeeGee: No, I said that would be interesting, but Airship questioned if the source supported that conclusion. So the concern has to be if it is right for DYK to let the interesting thing be implied, if not certain it is the correct interpretation of the relatively simple fact, or if that counts as clickbait. Do you have thoughts on that? Kingsif (talk) 13:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingsif: Sources: "A Milli Kadın Hokey Takımı'nın kaptanı Perihan Çınar" (in Turkish)[8], " Lisans Tarihi : 12.12.2005" (in Turkish)[9]. Is there still suspicion? Thank you. CeeGee14:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CeeGee: The source is good. The hook and source say the same thing. But the hook is only interesting by implication. The implication isn't in the source. There is no WP:V issue, but is it "right" to let the implication stand? I don't have an answer, and you can think yes or no. But it might be easier to suggest another hook to avoid the question entirely. Kingsif (talk) 16:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC
@AirshipJungleman29: You must know that copyediting by the Guild takes some time, which I cannot accelerate. On the other hand, where can I read the expire limit of a DYK-nomination? Moreover, I provided an ALT2-hook, which you may comment on. CeeGee15:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: I guess I am not the only one, whose DYK-nom occasionally needs copyediting. I always promptly reacted to requests of the reviewer. I don't know if the said discussion, which you had launched, has ended with a conclusion, and led to a rule of expiry limit at all. I think it is not hard to reject a DYK-nom with a reason like not interesting, too old or something if someone's intension is to find a solution for DYK backlog. CeeGee07:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I was not the one who brought up the idea of a two month rule—that was five administrators (Kusma, RoySmith, Gatoclass, Valeree, and Schwede66). You may note that in that discussion I wondered whether getting "accus[ed] of subjectivity and unnecessary hostility", as seems to be happening here, would be worth it. Do you want to ping one of them? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
- The article contains numerous typos and errors. I have tagged it as needing copyediting.
Current DYK guidelines which the article does not meet: WP:DYKINT and WP:DYKCOMPLETE. A new hook is needed, along with a copyedit for the article ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
The link you have provided shows that her getting a license is not intriguing in the slightest—it might as well say "her parents filled out some forms when she was eleven". Since no interesting hooks have been nominated in the last week, I am marking this as rejected. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)