Jump to content

Talk:Pericles Abbasi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Source assessment for meeting GNG

[edit]

Here is a source assessment table showing this page meets the GNG:

Source assessment table prepared by User:NWeil
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
No The subject attended the school where this was posted. No Assumed that there is no editorial control on these profile pages. Yes The source discusses the subject directly and in detail. No
Yes Yes The source is an established national magazine. No The article mentions the subject and quotes them, but the article is primarily about West campaign. No
Yes Yes The source is a major local news network. The subject is one of two people being paid, which is the reason for the article. Subject isn't exclusive reason for the article but a major part of it. ? Unknown
Yes Yes The source is a major local news network. No The article discusses the subject briefly as a candidate and as a representative. No
Yes Yes The source is a well known British news site with established editorial control. Yes The article discusses the subject directly and in detail. Yes
Yes The source is a nonprofit alternative newspaper, known for it's journalism while not having a huge readership. Yes The article discusses the subject directly and in detail. ? Unknown
Yes No This is a self-published source, and the expertise of its author has not been established. Yes The article discusses the subject directly and in detail. No
Yes Yes The source is a major local news network. Yes The article discusses the subject directly and in detail. Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Nweil (talk) 23:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

[edit]

Why is this page protected to prevent vandalism when under “children” there is clearly some vandalism happening? 2001:861:72:CA70:59EB:F485:315F:252D (talk) 09:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed that bit of vandalism at least. Endwise (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2024

[edit]

Perry is of Greek and Kashmiri descent 81.141.189.124 (talk) 15:08, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 15:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not exist

[edit]

His spouse should not be listed as "A Woman". Also I don't think this page meets Wikipedia guidelines. Fal2x (talk) 01:52, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing sourced info

[edit]

For some reason 76.157.230.213 removed chunks from the page that were properly sourced and cited for no reason, including the coverage of Abbasi's controversy from UnHerd. You need to explain these removals, they can't be for no reason. 2607:FEA8:1F9B:6200:DD6E:788B:6AE6:941D (talk) 04:50, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also user Marincyclist keeps just reverting my fixes to 76.157.230.213's multiple vandalism edits. 2607:FEA8:1F9B:6200:DD6E:788B:6AE6:941D (talk) 05:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your "fixes" were reverted because you failed to explain your edits and removed content without any explanation. Marincyclist (talk) 05:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, compare the versions, it's the opposite, I was putting back the stuff the other guy removed with no explanation (for example the UnHerd quote). I didn't remove any content, I was reverting the page. 2607:FEA8:1F9B:6200:D74:E69:2861:6CE4 (talk) 05:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You made many edits. Only one of those edits readded the UnHerd quote. The others removed sourced content. Don't remove sourced content without a valid explanation, and please utilize edit summaries to avoid potential confusion in future. Thanks, Marincyclist (talk) 05:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You are completely confused. 2607:FEA8:1F9B:6200:D74:E69:2861:6CE4 (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed the edits and I apologize, I made a mistake. Please use edit summaries in future as it makes things a lot less confusing. Thanks, Marincyclist (talk) 06:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

On closer inspection, I believe this article fails WP:NBIO. The subject does not have sufficient "significant" coverage in reliable secondary sources. Marincyclist (talk) 05:44, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]