Talk:People's Choice Party

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Party metadata

This New Zealand article has some associated metadata templates to display political party colours and names in election candidate and results tables.

The table below shows the content of these metadata templates.

People's Choice Party — political party metadata
Color		Shortname
	#F8F9FA	People's Choice Party

Untitled

While its good to have new material added, it would be nice to have a source for it. It would also be nice if it was WP:NPOV. --IdiotSavant (talk) 01:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial rewrite

This article is currently full of unsubstantiated claims. The majority of these date to an edit made in May 2009 by someone with the username "Rusty Kane", the same name as the head of the party. Given the only source is an edit apparently by the party founder and that almost 8 years have not led to real sources, I am going to edit the article to stick only to what I can verify. I appreciate that online sources will only have so much detail on a party first registered in 1999, but I think it better to only have sourced facts. HenryCrun15 (talk) 13:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]