Talk:People's Alliance (Turkey)

Member parties

The table containing the alliance's member parties is modeled on that found in similar articles, such as the Italian one. These are not supposed to list every ideology associated with each party, but to give a quick summary. The ideology column does not even need to be here, but I originally included it for informative purposes. I will revert the article so that the table only lists one ideology per party, and if you have objections and insist we include all of them, then I suggest we simply remove the ideology column altogether. This is not an article about that. — Μαρκος Δ 12:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Random deleting.

Please stop deleting sourced facts. Things you don't know can exist! That's not your junkyard. Ok, for some of them you can be right but NOT FOR EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. Turkfromturkey (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

@Turkfromturkey: There are a few problems with your addition. (1) You cannot use Wikipedia as a source. (2) When I sample-tested some of your added claims, like the claim that the People's Alliance is a Islamist, your source did not support this claim. For the mentioned example, dw.com calls the party "Islamic-conservative", not "Islamist". --MrClog (talk) 11:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

(1) Wikipedia sourced ones are basic things for example I added ideoligies of BBP (Great Union Party) Islamism and gave source as Wikipedia because when you click Page of BBP you see Islamism. That's A well known fact I even don't need source for this. What you think even something Like cat is an animal needs source?

(2) İslami conservatism is a form of Islamism Just with a more moderate way. And that was not only source. Did you check one explains AKP support for Muslim Brotherhood? And other People' s Alliance supporter Islamism parties şike HÜDA, BBP, Yeniden Refah? Btw how can you explains devlete of YRP?

Note: Please forgive some disrespect of me Like This isn't your junkyard! ı was angry at the time.

Turkfromturkey (talk) 12:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for autofixes of My keyboard. Yes My English is not the Best but not bad as this. Turkfromturkey (talk) 12:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Btw you aren't A supporter of AKP right? Because every delete by you for protecting AKP. I think saying they are not Islamist is commentary. Turkfromturkey (talk) 12:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I'm not Turkish so I do not have particularly strong opinions on Turkish politics. Please note that facts on Wikipedia need sources, even if you think they are obvious. Also, if an article says that the People's Alliance has supported some Islamist parties, that is not the same as saying they are Islamist themselves. I see that you reinstates your edit, with, once again, a lot of information that is based on Wikipedia or on sources that do not support the content. I respectfully request that you revert your own edit and preserve the status quo until we have resolved this issue on the talk page, as outlined at WP:BRD.

While I appreciate that you apologise for some of your comments, I suggest that you then also stop saying things like "he Just attacking me" [sic] or other accusations. Best, MrClog (talk) 12:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

People's Alliance isn't A political Party, it's an Alliance of political parties so parties with them/supporter parties ideologies are Alliance's ideolgies. And I Said he Just attacking me because you deleted everything again without discuss.That is attacking. But still I should have been more polite. Sorry. Turkfromturkey (talk) 13:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

There are sources in same Page which proves they are Islamist. You can always reuse this sources in parts says they are Islamist instead of deleting. Deleting isn't helpful. If you think they are deserve to devlete you can discuss in Talk Page before do. And if I didn't answer you can discuss with other People with knowledge.Talk Page is open for everyone right? Turkfromturkey (talk) 13:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Unless a source says that the Alliance is Islamist, you cannot add it. Could you point out which sources allegedly claim that the Alliance is Islamist? So far, the sources you have cited do not seem to support the attached claims. I'll request a third opinion here. --MrClog (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Bästa svenske killen

@Bästa svenske killen: Could you explain here why you think my arguments are wrong? --MrClog (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

You are defending AKP is and his alliance isn't Islamist. How cän you explain friendship between AKP and Muslim Brotherhood? I have been in Turkey mäny times and encountered some AKP supporters and they called me khafir because I am Christian. Bästa svenske killen (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Defending idea of that they are not Islamist* Bästa svenske killen (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

@Bästa svenske killen: Your personal experiences are not sufficient to add the label "Islamist" to the page (see here). --MrClog (talk) 16:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Didn't you read all of My answer ? It is not only reason. Bästa svenske killen (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Your entire comment is original research, which is not valid. You need reliable sources to back up your claim. --MrClog (talk) 16:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Please answer that: If AKP isn't Islamist how cän you explain friendship between AKP and Muslim Brotherhood? Bästa svenske killen (talk) 16:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

People's Alliance and AKP kinda same btw (only non Islamist member of alliance is MHP and it is a slave of AKP right now if you know Turkish politics) Bästa svenske killen (talk) 17:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

DSP and HUDA PAR

@Beshogur and Braganza: they will contest on AKP list, so they are members of Alliance. Panam2014 (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

They are not, they did not sign alliance protocol. Beshogur (talk) 03:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

i don't really know what the difference between support & additional members is

BBP was am additional member in 2018 cause they didn't had their own list Braganza (talk) 05:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Google "cumhur protokolü". Beshogur (talk) 06:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

@Beshogur and Braganza: and now? Is the participation into AKP's list official? Panam2014 (talk) 18:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

its not about if its official, rather if they legally signed an agreement (idk) Braganza (talk) 18:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

You're right. For example Sarigul is on CHP list. Doesn't mean his party is part of Nation Alliance. Beshogur (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

@Beshogur and Braganza: the party lists are now officials so we should update the backing of parties outside the alliance Panam2014 (talk) 22:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

yeah its kinda missleading, maybe we should replace Founding members with like "Members" (parties which run with their own list) Braganza (talk) 04:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm sorry I edited it wrong, how can I get it back?

I'm sorry I edited it wrong, how can I get it back? 188.3.176.245 (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I’ve reverted your edit. For future reference, you can revert your edits from the edit history. Uness232 (talk) 22:10, 2 March 2024 (UTC)