Talk:Pentacene
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
IBM image
[edit]It would be great if IBM released this image under a free license. — RockMFR 22:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm putting it up. Hang the control freaks around here. It's the only such image in existence and IBM Zurich have even published it for public viewing on Flicker here. If IBM don't want it up, they need only complain. ObsessiveMathsFreak (talk) 01:41, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've added the image. I can almost hear the hysterical shrieks. ObsessiveMathsFreak (talk) 02:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think that is a fairly good fair use rationale. It got me thinking that perhaps it belongs in the infobox as this is the actual representation of the molecule. What do you think? Smartse (talk) 02:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think that would be a good idea. It would break the infobox convention across pages and moreover, the standard diagrams are easier to understand than a fuzzier representation. ObsessiveMathsFreak (talk) 03:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I think that is a fairly good fair use rationale. It got me thinking that perhaps it belongs in the infobox as this is the actual representation of the molecule. What do you think? Smartse (talk) 02:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've added the image. I can almost hear the hysterical shrieks. ObsessiveMathsFreak (talk) 02:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- It's not the only image in existence, of course, there are more images in the Science article for example. I love the one with six pentacene molecules. But who's easier to get permission from, IBM or Science? --Cubbi (talk) 19:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Mobility
[edit]Where does the value 5.5 cm2/(V·s) for the hole mobility in OFETS come from? I have read all the cited papers, but this value does not appear.
Another image
[edit]This article purportedly has a better image but I hesitate to add it because it does not seem to agree with the shape and number of atoms in the diagram found here. Can an expert resolve or explain the apparent difference? 72.208.150.248 (talk) 10:46, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Problems in the table of properties
[edit]Melting point > 300 °C (572 °F; 573 K) sublimes at 372 °C Boiling point 40–43 °C (104–109 °F; 313–316 K) at 0.15 torr Pretty sure all substances have to pass the melting point before reaching a boil... anyone got the correct numbers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Norlesh (talk • contribs) 18:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:09, 18 May 2020 (UTC)