Jump to content

Talk:Pennsylvania Route 343

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePennsylvania Route 343 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 31, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 23, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Pennsylvania Route 343 underwent numerous realignments until 1970?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 343/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  1. RD: "The highway also passed the Mount Lebanon Cemetery, but there was no direct access to it. At the intersection with Cherry Street, State Route 343 entered the community of Reindeldville, located northeast of downtown Lebanon." - wrong tense. "The stay in..." too much personification. I would add more wikilinks - you can link to things once in the article, outside of the lead. "fireman's park"? Link to concurrent. Last sentence - highway continues as a locally-maintained highway? For the casual reader, its hard to tell the difference. History: "There was no concurrency, and instead, There, the highway turned to the northeast and into Lickdale, where it terminated at an intersection with State Route 443.[2]" ? Last sentence - was now = is now? Major intersections - are there no mileposts for the concurrency?
  2. Sourcing good.
  3. Neutral, broad, stable. Image of the road would be nice.

On hold Just a few minor things to fix. --Rschen7754 (T C) 21:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 01:13, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Passing. FAC may complain about the links. --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

[edit]

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:03, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]