Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   PA highways, is this a WP:RS? Also, could you use an actual direct link for the Google Map, and possibly use the {{cite map}} template for citation?

   The PA highways site is used for a lot of Pennsylvania highway articles, so I figured it was reliable. Check it out and let me know if it'll work. If not I'll find something better. I'll work on the map links. Deigo (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

   Check the WP:RS noticeboard, and if they give it the green light, give me the perm link to the approval --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 14:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

   Someone said "maybe" Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. It's on the bottom. Deigo (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Please address the reference issues. On hold. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Pass --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 03:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)