Talk:Pelješac Bridge

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A clearer map showing which land is Croatia and which is Bosnia Herzegovina would enhance the article. Pontificake 19:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pelješac Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131213111416/http://www.croatiantimes.com:80/news/Business/2013-12-11/34880/Peljesac_bridge_is_best_solution_to_connect_the_south_of_Croatia to http://www.croatiantimes.com/news/Business/2013-12-11/34880/Peljesac_bridge_is_best_solution_to_connect_the_south_of_Croatia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"BiH"

At one point the Croatian/Bosnian abbreviation "BiH" for Bosnia and Herzegovina is used without any explanation in the middle of the English text. This should surely be replaced by the full English name, since there isn't a standard English abbreviation for the name of the country.213.127.210.95 (talk) 15:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pelješac Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/32366/natjecaj-za-most-jarun-je-namjesten
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/en/articles/view/21687/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728161135/http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/45241/bosnia-forbids-passage-of-dubrovnik-motorway-through-its-territory to http://www.nacional.hr/en/clanak/45241/bosnia-forbids-passage-of-dubrovnik-motorway-through-its-territory

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second largest span in Europe

The claim that, if constructed, the main span of 568 meters would be the second largest in Europe, seems invalid, see this list (at least the Great Belt East Bridge and the New Little Belt Bridge are both longer and wider. Lots of other bridges are longer as well). Am I missing something?

Krnkkty (talk) 10:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

568 is span of old project from 2007 with height 35 meters. After negotiations with Bosnia new height is 65 meters and span is cca 2400m — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.175.192 (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, 2400m is the total length of the bridge, not the span length (the distance between two supports). A span of 2400m would be the largest in the world. --Krnkkty (talk) 16:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]