Talk:Peirce's criterion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Formula and rationale
[edit]Shouldn't we give the formula and rationale, instead of two code examples?
--138.246.2.177 (talk) 11:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. This article desperately needs a concise, English language description of what Peirce's criterion actually is. That is, an English language description sufficient for a moderately knowledgeble person to carry out the process with a pen and paper. -- 162.238.240.55 (talk) 00:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Rubbish
[edit]Sorry, but the article is rubbish. It doesn't even contain the criterion. 193.0.108.43 (talk) 20:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)