Talk:Pedro de Mendez

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Merge

This should be merged because the significance of the character itself, as the article says already, is not very important, despite the scholarly attention. I will do it myself soon as long as there are no objections.Sadads (talk) 02:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I certainly do agree that this character doesn't need an article of its own and that a merge is more than advisable, I find it rather hard to place the information contained here in a manner not awkward within the scope of the Gulliver's Travels article, at least in its present state. One would probably need to create a whole new section titled "Characters" or something of the like and also include some data pertaining to other characters (maybe some summary description of sort, like here) so as to make it stick together. If you're more inspired than I am, by all means, I formally encourage you to merge both pages.
-- Howdoesitflee (talk) 04:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Onomastic realism

Seems to me that there should be a note to the effect that "Pedro de Mendez" is not a credible Portuguese name.

"de" is never used with a patronymic (be it Portuguese or Spanish).
the correct spalling for the Portuguese form is "Mendes", and for its Spanish equivalent is "Méndez"; granted that in the time of Swift neither languages had the same clear and strict spelling rules that they gained later.

--Tuvalkin (talk) 01:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]