This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
Sorry, I was unaware that this article was owned by Srnec, considering the only reason for the revert was "why?". Most noble articles have a separate section showing marriages, children, mistresses, illegitimate children, making it easier to locate their descendants. Apparently this version[1], makes that information easier to find than this version[2]. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The paragraph is integral where it is. Subsequent paragraphs must be rewritten to accomodate your desired changes, which are anyways unnecessary. Who cares if "most noble articles" do it that way? If most noble articles were unsourced shit, would you turn this one into shit and remove its sources too? But I'm glad you recognise my ownership of the article. I suppose that means you'll stay away without permission? ("That information", of course, is not supposed to be easier to find than any other piece of information about our guy. It just happens that you want to be able to find it more easily, probably because nothing about Pedro interests you.) —Srnec (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
