Talk:Peak oil/GA3

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I believe this article no longer meets the requirement to be "Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic;[6] and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)."

because 1) Since this article was listed as good in 2015 climate change has become much more important politically so how those politics relate to peak oil should be explained in much more detail. 2) There is so much old detail in the article that it is very hard to read. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:09, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some improvements but do not have time to bring it back up to good standard. As no one has commented I am rerating it.Chidgk1 (talk) 11:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]