This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
An image used in this article, File:Paula Cox.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
@Mewulwe: I am unsure what the major opposition to numbering the premiers is, near all of them were already numbered, while you may deem it arbitrary its not especially uncommon (e.g. all US presidents are numbered). Many of the premiers have been numbered for years (one with incorrect numbering). I'm interested in hearing the reasoning. Lalichii (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is entirely uncommon for premiers of Bermuda. What does that have to do with U.S. presidents? You understand this is a very specific U.S. custom? This isn't done almost anywhere else in the world. So it's simply unsourced. Unless you can find good pre-Wikipedia evidence of the holders of a particular office being commonly and consistently numbered, you can't just add arbitrary numbers based on a potentially incorrect or ambiguous Wikipedia list. That some error has been on Wikipedia for years is obviously no argument to keep it. Most of these numbers were in fact added by a single user, GoodDay. I will remove them where I come across them, but I can't be responsible for removing all thousands of them. Mewulwe (talk) 10:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think numbering helps users grasp how far along the leaders are but I can see why you disagree. Here is a page on the Bermuda gov website that number premiers, is this sufficient to satisfy your request? Lalichii (talk) 15:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, this is clearly copied from Wikipedia, down to the italics. In any case such a table would not be enough, as the numbers there could be ad hoc and not in wider use. You need pre-Wikipedia evidence that a certain numbering is consistently used. Mewulwe (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I'd have less problems with Mewulwe's anti-numbering stance, if he applied it evenly. Had he removed the numberings of all the Bermuda premiers instead of just Cox & Scott, there'd be no inconsistencies. GoodDay (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
