Talk:Paul Vincze

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Sculpture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

No title[edit]

Moved from User talk:Vanjagenije

hello,don't move my images on paul Vinzce by editing article— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 00:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilal philosopher: There is no "my" in Wikipedia. Anybody is allowed to edit as long as WP:policies and guidelines are respected. By the way, those images represent WP:copyright violations and will be removed soon. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

edit without destroying — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 00:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

respect yourself and don't give me orders on my talk page , if you see any violation on my articles you can discuss it with wikioedians without acusse me derictely . respect yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilal philosopher: I am not accusing you. I just advice you to respect Wikipedia's policies. You are not allowed to remove maintenance templates without resolving the underlying issues. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had resolve all problems , I don't see any problem now , if u see it resolve it and remive templates !! look brother, if u are an administrator don't make people leave writing on wikipedia , some administrators are dictators , you had remove a category classicism in arcticle , images which u had remove it was not violated because it public .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 19:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilal philosopher: No, the issues are not resolved. The article is still an WP:ORPHAN, there is still only one WP:SOURCE and WP:NOTABILITY is not well established (though this is connected to the lack of sources). Also, the term "classicism" usually refers to ancient Greece and Rome. "Neoclassicism" is more appropriate for modern forms of classical art. Article should be in as precise category as possible. We have categories such as Category:Neoclassical sculptors. But, we need a WP:reliable source that refers to Vinzce as "(neo)classicist". The one source you provided ([1]) does not mention classicism at all. Also, please, WP:assume good faith and WP:be civil towards other editors. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and you have to learn to interact with other editors in a civil manner. And, you should always WP:SIGN your talk page posts. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:42, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- p.s. As about the images, please explain why do you think they are in the WP:public domain. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

classicism it an artistic ideology and any one can believe it, it a manner of thinking not a period belongs to greec or any other.., about editors I say just that some jews thinkers r materialist what wrong with that ? you make an article writing in wikipedia as a struggle !! keep classicism category .. it's the spirit of vinzce's works ..you don't know what I mean by this category , is very important to understand those artistic works .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 01:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bilal philosopher: I have no idea what you mean by about editors I say just that some jews thinkers r materialist. In Wikipedia, it is not important what "you mean", the only important thing is what wp:reliable sources say. You still haven't provided any reliable source that refer to Vinzce as a classicist. And, you should really WP:SIGN your posts. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:40, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wrong by writing here , I must just read for myself without writing for others in your govern . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 15:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]