Jump to content

Talk:Paul Schenck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split

[edit]

Note: this is currently one Wikipedia page that attempts to document both of the Schenck brothers. Should it be split into two pages? -- Pinktulip 03:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems sensible to split it to me. I don't have time at the moment - why not Be Bold and do it? :) -Localzuk (talk) 11:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It should either be split, or renamed Paul and Robert Schenck. -GTBacchus(talk) 08:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robert dropped the fetus

[edit]

I will note here on the discussion page that Robert Schenck accidentally DROPPED the fetus onto the sidewalk. Distusting. But I do not think that it is significant enough to go into the article. -- Pinktulip 12:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Aborted child"

[edit]

Isn't this a violation of NPOV? Lingually, this term is an oxymoron-- a "child," by definition, has been born. This is why we have the words "zygote," "embryo," and "fetus." Unless there's an objection and discussion, I would like to change this.

-- Doin' it.

he is a grandfather of one of the Amish girls in the Amish School Shootings.

Spiritual Integrator

[edit]

What is a "Spiritual Integrator"? It seems not to be a common, easily understandable term and has no article to explain it in WP. Is it professional jargon? Is there a concrete definition of it somewhere? As it is not explained it seems out of place in the lede of an article. regards, Guffydrawers (talk) 09:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic priest

[edit]

Although one of the two references alludes to it in its title, I don't see it mentioned anywhere in the text that Paul Schenck is now an ordained Catholic priest. SHJohnson (talk) 17:25, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Content

[edit]

An editor (who has only ever edited this one page) removed unsourced content in January of this year, namely an entire paragraph that detailed the anti-abortion activism of the subject, with an edit summary of "Edited for conciseness." There is at least one reliable source to back up those claims, and an entire separate article on a court case (using said reliable source) with his name in the title. This paragraph should be brought back, albeit with proper sourcing, as the subject is at least partially notable because of his anti-abortion activism. GunnarBonk (talk) 05:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After a further few minutes of research, multiple other articles have come up, including one that states he helped found Operation Rescue.
Lancaster Online, 29 Jan 2015
Free Speech Center (Middle Tennessee State University), 30 July 2023 GunnarBonk (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(forgot to link)
Lancaster Online, 29 Jan 2015
Free Speech Center (Middle Tennessee State University), 30 July 2023 GunnarBonk (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]