Talk:Paul Putner
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paul Putner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I notice that at some point someone has changed him from British to English - what is considered good practice in this matter? It wasn't inaccurate before - is the salient factor that English is more specific? Scatterkeir 19:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Changed that back to British - while English is more specific in some sense, "English" isn't strictly a nationality as far as I'm aware. It's also incredibly easy to note that he's English from the first line of the article. Oddtwang (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)