Talk:Paul George/GA3

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anonymous1261 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I may not review the criteria in a specific order. Please understand.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Now the tool says that 96% copyright of here: [1] but it looks to have copied from wikipedia. I am putting on hold now, please resolve the issue.

   How do I resolve the issue if the website copied from Wikipedia? The website indicates that it was updated on July 1, 2024 and that a full biography can be found on Wikipedia - FiveXdollars — Preceding unsigned comment added by FiveXdollars (talk • contribs) 20:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Nothing specific here.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: