Talk:Paul Diwakar

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

A separate bio for Diwakar is relevant since his work in various organisations is closely linked to his background as a dalit and christian. --Husager 14:05, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have again reverted a deletion by user Benjamin P. Holder (talk • contribs). He has deleted the article citing lack of notability as the reason, but has not followed the guidelines put forward in WP:Notability. I have now put the {{notability}} tag on the page, and would like comments from Benjamin P. Holder and other editors as to why the article should be deleted. As stated above I think the article is relevant on it's own. --Husager 14:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

notability and reliable sources

The subject of the article is likely notable enough, but needs additional reliable sources to be referenced. There seem to be substantial news articles with the subject, but the few I tried to look at were either minor coverage, or not available online. --Rocksanddirt 23:12, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing seems to have changed. He gets a fair number of trivial mentions because of his relationship to the NCHDR but the stories are about the organisation, not him. As are all of the interviews I have seen. I think this article needs either to be deleted or redirected. - Sitush (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]