This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
what on earth is a "non-marxist literary critic"? may as well call him a non-alien literary critic, or a non-surrealist literary critic, or... etc etc. if most of the other literary critics in the world were marxists then it might possibly make sense to differentiate him from them this way, but as it is, it just sounds... odd HieronymousCrowley (talk) 18:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"Anti-marxist" might be a better term then "non-marxist" for the reasons that HieronymousCrowley points out as well as many others. This article with sentences like "In a world of categories, labels, genres, Professor Cantor has proven himself to be remarkably resistant, publishing on Oscar Wilde one day, on Salman Rushdie another, on Samuel Beckett another, and then winning the Ludwig von Mises Prize for Scholarship in Austrian School Economics on yet another." Sounds a bit more like shameless self promotion and less like a neutral point of view article that belongs on wikipedia. Serious rewording and clean up seem to be necessary.86.24.53.39 (talk) 00:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
