Talk:Patty Duffek

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This redirect is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have more info on Patty Duffek I think might be a good addition such as about a recent interview she did, etc. I don't think it violates anything bad since it's nothing negative or libelous. What do you other Patty Duffek contributors think??

MaxButterchuck (talk) 19:13, 14 May 2008 (UTC)MaxButterchuck —Preceding unsigned comment added by MaxButterchuck (talk • contribs) 18:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you can do to flesh out the article would be great. Most of the Playmate articles are stubs with a need for expansion. Just, please, remember to cite the interview when you add info. Dismas|^(talk) 20:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dismas! I wanted to run it by my fellow Playmate-cntributors first. What is the best way to cite an interview or source for a page like this> just mention the actual book title/author/interview-title, etc.? Thanks again and I welcome advice! MaxButterchuck (talk) 12:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)MaxButterchuck[reply]

See {{cite book}} or {{cite journal}} Dismas|^(talk) 14:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good deal! I will keep it in-parameter and just write about the interview being done in a 2008 book. It's actually a direct interview done between that author and Patty Duffek in summer of 2007 (not an internet email-exchange)I thought it worthy of adding to the article because it is a RECENT activity by the '84 Playmate. So many of them drop off the radar after their magazine appearance. MaxButterchuck (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)MaxButterchuck[reply]

I'd like to add a short paragraph about a positive "Fan Award" she got in 2004 MaxButterchuck (talk) 13:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)MaxButterchuck[reply]

Chrissypoo160: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissypoo160 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1) I believe the claim that she is or has ever been a social worker is unverifiable.

2) Here's another unverified claim: "During the late 1990s, she owned an online Cigar Store named Patty Puffs. She appeared nude in ads for the store, her first nude poses since her Playboy days. The business venture has since failed and the site was taken down." The unverified source is marxz on 02-09-2008, 05:06 PM at http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t10771-patty-duffek-584.html. Further there is a photo (clothed) of her apparently selling cigars - http://img155.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=40555_fea1adde_jpg_orig_123_1082lo.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrissypoo160 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You might not have spotted it, but if you peer beyond the lady in the foreground, she appears to be (not clothed) in the pictures in the background. Which makes me wonder why the business failed! -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]