Talk:Patrol Point
Appearance
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Standalone or Merge
[edit]Should this topic be completely merged into Line of Actual Control?
OR
Should this article stay, and a summary of Patrol Point be added to Line of Actual Control?
DTM (talk) 07:03, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Moved to Talk:Line of Actual Control
DTM (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Weak merge: A merge to Line of Actual Control would be reasonable since that article is not very developed and the Patrol Points/Patrolling Points are discussed solely in that context (i.e. context and length in WP:MERGEREASON). The topics probably aren't quite discrete enough for separate articles. Could go either way though, particularly if the two articles are significantly developed further.As a side note independent of whether this gets merged, the article should probably decide whether these are most commonly called "Patrol Points" or "Patrolling Points" (the first sentence and title do not currently match). — MarkH21talk 21:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Merge: This is not a stand alone concept but makes sense only in the context of LAC. So obviously it should be merged. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:09, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Redirect-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class Chinese military history articles
- Chinese military history task force articles