This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
To illustrate my point on references I have provided a Link. The tag at the top of the article has been there for quite some time. [1] You will also notice the efforts which are going into referencing this article. If the information in the article is challenged, you could hardly keep referring to two sources and leave it at that. For example which source for which statement? Another example of a well referenced articles is this, [2]. Now we can hardly expect one standard of referencing for one article, if we are likewise not going to accept it on all articles. Regards--Domer4809:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am more than familiar with referencing and no-one is going to raise a serious challenge here. It is ludicrous to expect every line, every minor comment to be cited, when two very major works have been quoted which contain virtually everything said in the article. I am not sure what your purpose is here other than to make life difficult for those just trying to expand WP. David Lauder10:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
David, I resent your remark about “making life difficult.” I was more than convinced you would understand my point. You are quite correct though how ludicrous it is how some expect every single line on an article referenced. I might add, having referenced an article, to have every referenced challenged on the reliability of the source, of suggested bias of the source, or the NPOV and the like is quite trying. I more than understand your point, and therefore understand you comment above? I would suggest that at least some of the article be correctly referenced, as this makes it much difficult later, if information is challenged. I would be more than willing to outline the pitfalls I my self have encountered in this particular area. I did notice though, that there is a vast number of articles like this, could you possibly help with reviewing them for references, thanking you in advance, Regards --Domer4810:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I just feel that this is not a long article, there is nothing contentious in it, the fellow is very old indeed, and all the info there can be found in the publications cited. It is time consuming doing endless citations (I have done so in other articles) where such current publications are available in all good libraries for verification. Nevertheless I shall see what can be done. David Lauder10:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks David I knew you would understand. It is time consuming doing endless citations I know. You are more than weclome to review the troubles I have had. I found the best way to deal with it though, was to tag the articles myself, and then begin the slow process of referencing. Like I said if you need a hand with tagging, I will be more than willing to help. Regards --Domer4810:52, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}