Jump to content

Talk:Patricia Wrede

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Biography Assessment

Some references and a bit more organization, and this would easily be a B.

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

13th Child

[edit]

Searches for the Thirteenth Child or 13th child show the totally unrelated horror movie, which may cause adults who consult Wikipedia to not buy the delightful children's book The Thirteenth Child.

What do people think about creating a page for the book, and/or a disambiguation page.

yea me

[edit]

Terible symtax and spelling you hav. For you I fizxed the whol articleeSunSmith (talk) 06:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cecilia and Kate stories

[edit]

First of all, I changed the title to include both protagonists. Only seems fair.

Second, I removed "or The Enchanted Chocolat Pot" from Sorcery and Cecelia. It was hard to format, and if we're going into full titles it should be, first Sorcery and Cecelia or The Enchanted Chocolate Pot: Being the Correspondence of Two Young Ladies of Quality Regarding Various Magical Scandals in London and the Country, then The Grand Tour : Being a Revelation of Matters of High Confidentiality and Greatest Importance, Including Extracts from the Intimate Diary of a Noblewoman and the Sworn Testimony of a Lady of Quality, and that's just too much. (I made the titles bold because otherwise it was hard to weed out the text from the titles.)

I'll concede that the Chocolate Pot part is debatable, which is why I'm adding this note. Personally, I think it looks neater without it, and it's never listed that way in other books.

There's a book club edition of both Mairelon books call Magic and Malice, so it seemed reasonable to call the set that.

-Salli 22:46, 25 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Niece and nephews

[edit]

I see no reason for the niece and nephew count with place of residence unless those nieces and nephews had a large impact on her. Mentioning sons and daughters might be standard, but why does it matter how many further related people she has? --88.130.178.160 (talk) 06:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She mentions it in her bio, probably because she's written several books aimed at teenagers as well as adults. (BTW, I've just added a bunch of refs to said bio to the first few paragraphs.) I think we should retain that info. Cheers, CWC 15:56, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patricia Wrede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patricia Wrede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]