Talk:Pather Panchali/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in excellent shape, and it definitely meets the GA criteria. I believe it is very close to FA standard, if not there already.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Very well done.

   B. MoS compliance:

   Only one minor problem: Manual of Style (spelling) should be taken care of. Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well researched.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   BTW, isn't there a movie poster?

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Very well done overall. Impressive work, considering the hard work it took to get the required sources and information to make it comprehensive. An aside note, I would be happy to see the red links addressed. Overall, I enjoyed very much reading the article, it is interesting, informative, insightful, and above all very well written/sourced. Good luck with taking this article one step further towards FA status! Regards.

Shahid • ^Talk2me 10:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)