Talk:Passages Malibu

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Passages Ventura was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 26 September 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Passages Malibu. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

tag

Greetings: I just removed this tag from the top:

On the grounds that I couldn't find any points where it didn't meet all the criteria of Wikipedia:ORG. If someone (tag poster perhaps) would like to go through and point out which specific aspects they feel need to be addressed, hit me up, love to chat. I'm willing to look up more references if that's the consensus, but out of laziness would rather hold off unless someone specifically thinks the current ones don't suffice (which currently include Forbes and such). Cheers, Tallyho54 (talk) 02:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Drugrehabexpert - it appears you re-added a tag similar to the one for Promises Treatment Centers, but didn't address how you believe the page doesn't meet the criteria of Wikipedia:ORG. Unfortunately that leaves us no grounds to discuss and reach a consensus, so while you're of course free to put the tag back up, please only do so if you also leave a note explaining your reasons. (I also removed the tag concerning self-published sources as excluding publishing info about the founder's books they are all third-party.) Anyways, this isn't an attempt to start an edit war, but a productive conversation. I'll leave the advert tag because that's more subjective, maybe will use it as incentive to streamline a bit. Tallyho54 (talk) 03:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Major Edit Needed, if this page is notable enough to stay

This page is a real mess. I just did a major edit in order to help bring the page up to Wikipedia guidelines. The page used to read like an advertisement and was clearly written by a Passages employee. Half of the references here still go to a profile of one of the founders in a Los Angeles dating magazine. I started the controversy portion, but did not have time to flesh the page out. It needs a lot of work if it is even notable enough to continue existing at all. Magic1million (talk) 00:32, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

Although the facilities operate separately, they appear to have the same founders/history/methodology. It makes more sense to combine Ventura and Malibu into one page. This will also help with the notability concern discussed on this talk page. Magic1million (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removed tag, note at Talk:Passages_Ventura Tallyho54 (talk) 23:51, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note response on Talk:Passages_Ventura. Short version: These pages should be combined so that users don't have to update two quite similar pages with any change.Magic1million (talk) 02:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Prentiss

Although there is already an article for Passages Malibu, I think that there should be a separate article for the founder, Chris Prentiss. In addition to opening Passages, Prentiss is an author, one-time filmmaker, and ex-real estate developer. He has had a very interesting career path, and is worthy of his own article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaerlich (talk • contribs) 05:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I think he is an asshole.

Assholes get articles too, but there are plenty of one-time film makers, minor authors, ex-real estate developers, and people with interesting careers that don't. I really doubt he meets the criteria for a separate article given that this article has very little content by itself. Sterling.M.Archer (talk) 22:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link in “Controversy”

LA Weekly link as the source that the founders don’t believe addiction is a disease no longer works. 2600:1700:4483:4810:1D56:CC4F:23EC:637E (talk) 22:30, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]