Talk:Pascal's calculator

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Patent#Etymology|royal privilege]] The anchor (#Etymology) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The intersection of two perpendicular cylinders is one point

This entry is in response to the removal of this statement by 108.1.194.70
if you go to the All Elementary Mathematics - The Mathematical Web High School page titled:
Tangent plane of a ball, a cylinder and a cone, retrieved today,
figure 96 shows the intersection of a cylinder and a plan which is one line in this case MN. Now take another Cylinder intersecting another plan and their intersection M'N', position the cylinders perpendicularly and touch the planes, MN and M'N' cross in one point. QED.
Ezrdr (talk) 10:03, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the centre lines of the cylinders, I would call them skew lines and not perpendicular. Here's the intersection of two cylinders (at the centre). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.104.221 (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic versions

Sterling Products' "Add-it" had some popularity in the mid 20th century. IBM even marketed a hexadecimal version for code checking. knoodelhed (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talking Heads

The two paragraphs concerning 'talking heads' have nothing to do with mechanical calculators. In particular the bracketed statement "(binary arithmetic)" is entirely unsupported - limiting the head to yes/no answers is not binary arithmetic, and there is no other evidence of binary arithmetic being used in the sources given.

I have removed the bracketed statement, and I would further suggest the two paragraphs are removed from this article.Armulwp (talk) 09:42, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow,this is perfect 105.113.33.162 (talk) 22:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pascal's calculator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111019060808/http://www.skd.museum/en/museums-institutions/zwinger-with-semperbau/mathematisch-physikalischer-salon/index.html to http://www.skd.museum/en/museums-institutions/zwinger-with-semperbau/mathematisch-physikalischer-salon/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nine's complement, nines' complement, or nines complement?

Donald Knuth recommends placing the apostrophe after the 's' when referring to the diminished radix complement of base n+1 (e.g. nines' complement is the diminished radix complement in base 10), and placing the apostrophe before the 's' when referring to the radix complement of base n (e.g. ten's complement is the radix complement in base 10). See Numeric complements. The Ones' complement and Two's complement articles also follow this convention. However, as mentioned in Numeric complements, "Most writers use one's and nine's complement, and many style manuals leave out the apostrophe, recommending ones and nines complement." --Ebichu63 (talk) 16:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]