Talk:Party of the Democratic Revolution

Mexico High‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Socialism High‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Policies?

Some examples of their politics would be most welcome. Unfortunately I don't read spanish. 84.48.194.162 23:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also am wondering why there is nothing on their policy positions here. The articles on the other two major Mexican political parties include at least some information on where they stand. Joamiq (talk) 15:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Six years on, and still little information on their policies Ceagull (talk) 06:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Felipe Calderón

I feel it is not neutral to say that Felipe Calderón made claims to victory, when López Obrador did the same thing. I feel it shows Calderón in a pretty bad way, and anyways Calderón shouldn't even be in this page since he is a candidate from another party. El Oso 23:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Video scandals

I think the video scandals shouldn't have place at this page because other parties have also been involved in other corruption circumstances (and even worse than this) which are not mentioned on their pages. To be objective, the information on every party should be equal, which means that some specific information should be included or not, but not only on one side and not on the other. In case it is included, this should also be in a complete version and not only containing half of the truth, because objectivety is lost. Aldera 01:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Michaelas10, please note that I have restored the PRD page to its version before the recent changes. Please note that the editor also attempted to make the same changes on the Felipe Calderon page, but the changes were (not by me) reversed. In restoring this page, please consider whether a 2006 Presidential Election section is even appropriate. The PAN (Conservative Party) page does not include it. Would it be appropriate to begin one? I'd rather not see one, on either the PRD entry, or the PAN entry. [[[User:69.211.11.21|69.211.11.21]] 13:09, 19 December 2006 (UTC)]

Fair use rationale for Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif

Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif

Image:Partido de la Revolucion Democratica.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:40, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

The History section mentions that the Frente Democrático Nacional's candidate, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas won the 1988 Federal Election. While this is a common belief in Mexico, the source of the information is not well documented, and so, displaying these events in such a way could result in an argumentative, biased article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.76.167.33 (talk) 15:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey founder uu 2600:6C51:617F:2BC2:FD40:AEC3:67BB:F967 (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seats out of total gained in 2006 elections; #s missing

In the 2006 legislative elections the party won out of 500 seats in the Chamber of Deputies and out of 128 Senators.

Someone familiar with Mexican politics, please fill in the #

--Homoaffectional (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Social democracy & Marxism

Does it really make sense to identify the ideology of the PRD as both Social democracy and Marxism when they both completely contradict each other? I'd say the party leans closest to Democratic Socialism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.169.31 (talk) 19:29, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree on the rationale above, but I'm tempted to remove "Democratic Socialism" as this is different from "Social Democracy". There is, however, confusion in the very core documents of the PRD. Although the party presents itself as "aspiring to build Democratic Socialism", it doesn't advocate for any type of communal or social ownership (apart from the re-implementation of agrarian Ejidos) and doesn't aim at opposing Capitalism (only its "Neoliberal variant"). This is typical of a social democratic programme, not a socialist one. Marxias (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PRD is a social democratic party, not a marxist party

Hello, PRD's official ideology is not marxism, is socialdemocracy. I'll edit it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.135.190.12 (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed edits

Hello, I am working on this article for a class assignment, the banner of which I have added to this talk page. I will address some of the problems that have been pointed out such as the limited view of the history of the PRD. I would like to divide the history into a chronological order which would include how the party was founded. I would also like to integrate the controversies into the history section since as many have pointed out, it having its own section does not provide a complete and unbiased view to the political party. I would also add a section on ideology

I would also like to add a section on the current structure and composition of the political party. The section on current structure and composition would include information on the separate factions of the PRD as well as how the president, secretary, and other positions are chosen.

Another section that I would be interested in adding would be policy positions. The information I have found so far is based on the state. So, I would appreciate any information on the policy positions of the entire party instead of just one candidate or one state.

Please let me know if you have any thoughts on how to edit this article! Nnlpz (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Article PJHC

Your expanded contribution improve your article since your initial contribution. I enjoyed reading your article and I believe that any general audience would be able to understand your topic. I could not find any major spelling or typo errors in your new text except the “Which” sentences that need something at the beginning of the sentence to form a complete sentence. For your final contribution, I think you can post more links on other articles to direct more traffic to your page and add to the “see also” page. I think adding content on the achievements of the party and the reforms it has brought to Mexico would be helpful as well. Pictures would also help to make the article more aesthetically pleasing and can potentially aid in visualizing various concepts. Overall, great job!

Dwang41 (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Comments

Your expanded contribution to this article really improved the comprehensiveness of the article. I liked that you included vital sections, such as “Principles” and “Internal Organizations” that described very important characteristics of the Party of the Democratic Revolution. There were a few grammatical errors in terms of incomplete sentences throughout the text but I liked that you used bullet points to make the principles section really concise and easy to read. Your formatting, readability, and neutrality were all in line with Wikipedia guidelines. In addition, your use of tables to visually represent the information was extremely successful. Overall, I would recommend expanding on the political climate in the history section in order to provide more context to the decades of PRD rise to power. Great job and keep up the good work! Aaie21 (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Party of the Democratic Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100109163113/http://www.ife.org.mx/documentos/Estadisticas2006/presidente/nac.html to http://www.ife.org.mx/documentos/Estadisticas2006/presidente/nac.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) position?

what are the current political positions of this party? the party's article isn't updated 141.226.13.116 (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Rice University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2015 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 15:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Modern Mexico

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2023 and 5 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Harelia (article contribs). Peer reviewers: JohnFrum1441, Oliver darmody.

— Assignment last updated by Jlbettis (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Party leadership

For defunct parties, should leadership positions be placed in the infobox? Because the party does not have an active president or secretary anymore. EchoLuminary (talk) 03:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]