Talk:Pars interarticularis

Anatomy: Gross Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

It would save new people 5 minutes if "Pars interarticularis" was actually labeled on the diagram. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.160.183 (talk) 07:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it is clearly visible on this diagram. Someone should put up side views of the vertebrae. Two are needed, one for a typical cervical vertebra, and the other to represent the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. In the meantime, I think the pars interarticularis is clearly visible in this image, http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File:Spondylolysis.jpg, but it is not labeled there. We laymen are waiting on you anatomists.

Solo Owl 11:55, 11 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eall Ân Ûle (talk • contribs)

Hangman's fracture

The text says that "hangman's fracture" is a fracture of both pars interarticularis of the C2. This is wrong, as it normally is the pedicles which are fractured, allowing the body of C2 to slip forward as it is no longer connected directly to the posterior collumn. In severe cases the C2/C3 facet joints can be subluxed or dislocated, but pars fractures are not typical. --79.243.240.123 (talk) 00:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]