This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
I understand, it is indeed a long article, warranting a long lede. However, there must be still some extent to the length of the lede. In this case, the lead section is longer than it should be. Take for example, the Michael Jackson page. (Which i am using for comparison for it is a FA) It's size is about twice as large as this article, but its lede is definitely shorter. I'm very sure some stuff currently (such as maybe the long-winded history) in the lede is not needed or can be less detailed. Leave the juicy "meat" for the body, not the lede. BonkersThe Clown(Nonsensical Babble)11:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC)