Talk:Parliament in the Making
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Parliament in the Making article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Parliament in the Making appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Copyright
[edit]I have reverted large updates by User:Whizz40 such as this. My reason is that some of the phrasing seems too close to the sources. For example:
- update — "Dramatising Democracy - asks whether dramas like The West Wing, Borgen or This House aid our understanding of the way governments operate or do they foster cynicism about whether democracy works"
- source — "Dramatising Democracy ... asks whether dramas like The West Wing, Borgen or This House aid our understanding of the way governments operate - or do they foster cynicism about whether democracy works?"
This won't do - please see WP:COPYVIO for guidance. Andrew D. (talk) 12:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Andrew, I clicked too hastily, before I had written what I actually had in mind, which I shouldn't have done. Thank you for quickly highlighting this. I have now written what I had in mind, in my own words, citing the sources I read. Whizz40 (talk) 11:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the revision. I haven't checked this in detail myself yet but have nominated the page for DYK, which will result in much scrutiny by others. Andrew D. (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)