Talk:Parineeta (2005 film)
![]() | Parineeta (2005 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]Why are we spoling the plot? --> not spoiled anymore.
Fair use rationale for Image:Parineetaposter.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Parineetaposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
In addition...
[edit]Having seen the film for myself, there are a few other minor things that probably need to be fixed. The subtitles seem to indicate that his name is spelt as Gurucharan. Also, Shekhar doesn't realise (by himself) that Lolita rejected Girish's hand in marriage - it was only when Girish returned the papers that he revealed he was married to Koel as Lolita claimed she was already married. The importance placed on marriage isn't really shown in the plot section - this could be fixed if it was more detailed with the significance of exchanging garlands etc. Ncmvocalist (talk) 00:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- In response to your thoughts, I will never trust the subtitles unless I know the source is reliable. My usual tryst with movies with subtitles has yielded only humor, and this I attribute to the poor/incorrect/atrocious subtitles. So, if I were you, I'd rather check the pronunciation and come up with the spelling. This is the best way, I feel, for Indian movies.
- About Shekhar's realization about Lolita's rejection to Girish's marriage proposal, I had not included this directly because I was facing a plot summary word count crunch. I was trying to limit the content by providing the gist alone. This has been addressed now.
- About the importance of marriage, I was not really sure of what you mean by "significance of exchanging garlands". What else did it signify but the marriage? Can you elaborate on this, please?
- Regards, Mspraveen (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know if I can agree completely with spelling it as pronounced, as the English language often doesn't do justice to Indian names, perhaps as a result of the lack of characters in the language. The subtitles seemed rather accurate, however, I can understand your concern, knowing how ridiculous it can be. Why hasn't Gurcharan been included in the cast section? He plays a major role in terms of the storyline, doesn't he? If so, then there may be a way around it (to be on the safe side anyway).
- I can see now what you mean by just providing the gist - never mind my comment regarding garlands. I just felt that the symbolic significance needed some comment (although, the plot section may not be the appropriate section to include this after all) - the simple, perhaps innocuous act of exchanging garlands, can in some cultures, be considered a ritual for getting married - some people may not fully understand this and how significant/important/life-changing this can be. I think I'll stop while I'm ahead :P Ncmvocalist (talk) 02:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding the pronounciation. The name of the female lead should be written Lalita, instead of lolita{although its pronounced lolita} Bengali pronounciation of the 'a' sound is slightly different. {Bengali is pronounced simlilar to Bongoli, if I am not mistaken. Alexsanjoseph (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.199.213.130 (talk)
Discussion pertaining to non-free image(s) used in article
[edit]A cleanup page has been created for WP:FILMS' spotlight articles. One element that is being checked in ensuring the quality of the articles is the non-free images. Currently, one or more non-free images being used in this article are under discussion to determine if they should be removed from the article for not complying with non-free and fair use requirements. Please comment at the corresponding section within the image cleanup listing. Before contributing the discussion, please first read WP:FILMNFI concerning non-free images. Ideally the discussions pertaining to the spotlight articles will be concluded by the end of June, so please comment soon to ensure there is clear consensus. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Parineeta (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070312110752/http://www.thehindu.com:80/thehindu/mag/2005/08/07/stories/2005080700510500.htm to http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/mag/2005/08/07/stories/2005080700510500.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070105005336/http://www.bollywood.com:80/archives/2006/10/why_is_bollywoo.html to http://www.bollywood.com/archives/2006/10/why_is_bollywoo.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071102070055/http://in.rediff.com:80/movies/2005/jun/10pari.htm to http://in.rediff.com/movies/2005/jun/10pari.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Parineeta (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070905092511/http://in.rediff.com:80/movies/2005/jun/10chopra.htm to http://in.rediff.com/movies/2005/jun/10chopra.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Parineeta (2005 film)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
Will add some comments soon! Ncmvocalist 08:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
===Assessment/Review being conducted by Ncmvocalist===
Manual of style guidelines need to be followed more strictly in some areas. For example; captions of images do not end with full stops, and the movie's name shouldn't be bolded unnecessarily other than in the first sentence of the article. The article is largely unfocused in areas post-cast. 'Production' and 'Reviews...' certainly needs to be cut-down in length in order to conform with the summary-style article guideline. Further, there are some more unnecessary details of critics/reviews in the 'filming and music' subsection of production - this also raises questions about the neutrality of this article. The lead section also fails to mention important points such as cultural allusion, DVD availability, and the less-favourable reviews prior to the film's release - work is needed here to mention all of these, while being succinct. Despite the fact this may have been mentioned in another review/article, 'bit went on to become one of the hottest best-sellers. The report states that' can be omitted. The hottest best-sellers part can be avoided in this article to maintain neutrality. Although the prose is quite good for most of the article, there are areas in need for improvement. The spelling that would be preferred is the UK style rather than the USA style in this particular article (eg; realise as opposed to realize). However, despite these shortcomings, the article appears to be sound in the other areas. The unsatisfied GA criteria needs to be satisfied within the next 7 days if this article is to pass. Ncmvocalist (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC) == Response to the GA review ==
If there are any other issues that missed my attention or something new crops up, please feel free to direct your concerns on this page. Regards, Mspraveen (talk) 15:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC) == Re: Response to the GA Review ==
The review has been adjusted accordingly to reflect any other changes that have been made, as well as this reply. Good luck! Ncmvocalist (talk) 10:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC) == Re: Re: Response to the GA Review ==
Any further changes will be addressed if pointed out. With best regards, Mspraveen (talk) 13:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC) == Final Reviewer Response to the GA Review before GA Assessment completes ==
It has been 10 days since the hold was issued, and a extra time of 3 days has been granted. Please ensure that all of the above is met within the next 24 hours, and recheck for any other potential problems like NPOV in other areas of the article. If this is all fine, then this article is likely to pass. Best wishes - Ncmvocalist (talk) 02:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC) == In response to the final review ==
Hope all is clean with the remainder of the article. Best regards, Mspraveen (talk) 14:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC) == GA verdict == In terms of this particular GA process, despite the delays and the obvious lack of regard to the deadline in this case, there has been an outstanding improvement to the article across the board, especially in the final response (in the reviews section) and in the production sections. In its current version (http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Parineeta_%282005_film%29&oldid=179423903), all criteria have been satisfied in my opinion, however, I did not concentrate too much on a certain criterion (except in an obvious case). Despite this, I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors, notably User:Mspraveen who worked hard to bring it to this status. Congratulations!! Ncmvocalist 14:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 12:36, 23 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Parineeta (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090111062515/http://movies.indiainfo.com:80/interview/vidhu-vinod-chopra.html to http://movies.indiainfo.com/interview/vidhu-vinod-chopra.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070818211313/http://movies.indiainfo.com:80/interview/saif-ali-khan.html to http://movies.indiainfo.com/interview/saif-ali-khan.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816091013/http://movies.indiainfo.com:80/interview/diya-raima.html to http://movies.indiainfo.com/interview/diya-raima.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ibosnetwork.com/asp/filmbodetails.asp?id=Parineeta+(2005) - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017051411/http://planetbollywood.com:80/Film/Parineeta/ to http://planetbollywood.com/Film/Parineeta/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070630144802/http://www.mnfilmarts.org:80/m-spiff/2006/index2.html to http://www.mnfilmarts.org/m-spiff/2006/index2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110528223500/http://128.97.165.17/showevent.asp?eventid=3995 to http://128.97.165.17/showevent.asp?eventid=3995
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://2006.asianamericanfilmfestival.org/downloads/press/2006_indian.pdf - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211154520/http://www.festivalmarrakech.info:80/Sunday-3-December-2006_a368.html to http://www.festivalmarrakech.info/Sunday-3-December-2006_a368.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103141135/http://store.nehaflix.com:80/pasdudvd.html to http://store.nehaflix.com/pasdudvd.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Parineeta (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071209062655/http://www.movietalkies.com/artists/complete-profie.asp?ArtistId=44267 to http://www.movietalkies.com/artists/complete-profie.asp?ArtistId=44267
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081225054520/http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movies/cast/11638/index.html to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/movies/cast/11638/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles
- Mid-importance Indian cinema articles
- GA-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles
- GA-Class film articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles