Talk:Paridhi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paridhi article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Tamil Nadu / History / Literature / Classical Tamil Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Classical Tamil workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in August 2017.

Dravidian civilizations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dravidian civilizations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dravidian civilizationsWikipedia:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsTemplate:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsDravidian civilizations

Tamil civilization (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil civilization, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil civilizationWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTemplate:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTamil civilization

Apparent repetition to be checked

@User:Bhagya_sri113. G. P. Chellammal's claim that Paridhi employs storytelling and Sundaramurthi's claim of using folklore essentially mean the same here [1], as far as I can see. However, I don't have the Sundaramurthi source. I don't see any other source (including Chellammal's) claiming about couplet 320 either. Can you please check again? At best, these can be merged if the couplet number isn't wrong. Rasnaboy (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the couplet number is correct. Will merge as suggested. Bhagya sri113 (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]